We compared ABBYY VantageI and UiPath Document Understanding based on our users' reviews in across various parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
ABBYY Vantage is praised for its exceptional OCR capabilities, automation workflows, and data extraction functionality. Users appreciate its integration capabilities, fair pricing, and positive ROI. However, some users have pointed out areas for improvement in the user interface, integration capabilities, OCR accuracy, and pricing concerns. UiPath Document Understanding is known for its quick setup and implementation process, high accuracy in data extraction, efficient processing speed, and seamless integration with other UiPath tools. Users find the pricing competitive, with flexible licensing options. The software has received positive feedback for its ROI, although users have highlighted the need for improvements in accuracy, performance, flexibility, and user experience. Additionally, users highly praise the customer service and support provided by UiPath Document Understanding, finding it to be top-notch and responsive.
Features: ABBYY Vantage stands out for its robust OCR capabilities and flexible automation workflows. UiPath Document Understanding excels in high-accuracy data extraction and seamless integration with other UiPath tools. ABBYY Vantage focuses on flexibility and efficiency in automation workflows and is highly praised for its data extraction functionality. UiPath Document Understanding is known for its high accuracy in data extraction, extensive document type support, and fast processing speed.
Pricing and ROI: ABBYY Vantage's setup cost is relatively low compared to similar products, with a fair and reasonable pricing structure. UiPath Document Understanding offers competitive pricing with straightforward setup and flexible licensing options tailored to individual needs. ABBYY Vantage offers increased efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings, with automation and insights. UiPath Document Understanding provides improved efficiency, accuracy, and time-saving capabilities, highlighting productivity and streamlined processes.
Room for Improvement: ABBYY Vantage could improve in user interface, integration capabilities, OCR accuracy, and pricing. UiPath Document Understanding users suggest enhancements in data extraction accuracy, software performance, customization options, and user experience design.
Deployment and customer support: ABBYY Vantage takes longer to deploy/set up. UiPath Document Understanding has a quicker setup and implementation process, with faster deployment and less time to get started. ABBYY Vantage customer service is praised for being efficient and knowledgeable, while UiPath Document Understanding is described as top-notch and effective. Both offer quick issue resolution and helpful support teams.
The summary above is based on 94 interviews we conducted recently with ABBYY Vantage and UiPath Document Understanding users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The advantage for ABBYY Vantage is in the visual tools to parameterize and set documents."
"We can quickly integrate the catalogs with proper documentation."
"The solution has its own language that can be configured many ways and with higher accuracy than other products."
"The whole idea of designing your own templates is pretty much the bread and butter of the product, but that's really the best part because you can design flexible templates."
"Compared to other tools, ABBYY Vantage is better because it's very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale for big processes. We are able to process 1 million pages a day. Its accuracy is also very nice. It is a good feature that they have. It is an independent platform, which is its biggest advantage as compared to other solutions. It is also very stable and powerful. It is 100% on time."
"The handwriting recognition is very good, as it can recognize handwriting done with pen and paper with at least 70% accuracy."
"Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"UiPath's Document Understanding significantly reduces the effort needed to train a machine-learning model for our documents."
"The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined."
"The quality of the input documents is crucial because sometimes healthcare providers prefer automated processing rather than human review."
"The most valuable feature is the ability for humans to train the bot."
"The best feature, in my opinion, is, we can train the document using a machine-learning classifier."
"UiPath provides a useful feature that allows us to classify documents as invoices or not."
"AI Center is helpful for creating data sets. Machine learning helps with some extraction. The ML extractor gives good results after training."
"The highly visual and user-friendly interface was a standout feature."
"Machine learning needs to be improved."
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"The recognition intelligence could improve by having more details in the documents. There are limitations with the forms, templates, and manuscripts."
"There is an area of improvement. For example, when we read the data from the OCR, the accuracy is not good."
"The system does not always train itself to recognize data properly."
"There is always room for improvement in any product. Some of the configurations for the machine learning models for invoice reading are fairly complicated. There is so much customization that is possible with that sort of thing, so it makes sense that there are a lot of options, but some of the more important ones can be a little better streamlined or more upfront. Currently, machine learning models are a little bit difficult to configure satisfactorily."
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"There is still room for enhancement in capturing line items from invoices."
"The signature comparison feature of UiPath Document Understanding could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in handwriting processes."
"UiPath Document Understanding can improve its handwriting and signature recognition."
"The licensing model poses a significant challenge due to the fee charged for posting a model, which impedes the development of productivity-enhancing models."
"There are also problems with handwritten documents. The results from those are not 90 percent accurate. With scanned and native PDFs, it is 90 to 99 percent accurate, but the accuracy of handwritten documents is somewhat less. If they could improve on that, it would also be helpful."
"UiPath Document Understanding has difficulty identifying handwritten documents, and there is room for improvement."
"The interface has room for improvement."
More UiPath Document Understanding Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 1st in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 46 reviews while UiPath Document Understanding is ranked 2nd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 46 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while UiPath Document Understanding is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Document Understanding writes "Is easy to configure, user-friendly, and produces accurate results". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate, Tungsten TotalAgility and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas UiPath Document Understanding is most compared with Instabase, Tungsten TotalAgility, Nanonets, OpenText Intelligent Capture and IQ Bot. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. UiPath Document Understanding report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
