We performed a comparison between AgileCraft and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The linking of PI Objectives with different features was one of the cool things. It had features, epics, and stories out of the box."
"Most of my work is keeping track of what's been going on and identifying what is blocking future work. What I like about this solution is you can create a consolidated customized dashboard out of your files to identify what's been going on and identify who has how much data assigned to them."
"For QA, the most interesting for me are boards, backlog, and filters."
"The solution works well and does what it needs to do."
"The solution offers up great transparency that makes it possible for everyone inside the departmental organization to see what's happening."
"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."
"Internally we use Jira for our own implementations and capturing requirements and our customers are using the whole tool for the whole software development life cycle. They're using it for the full life cycle of the product."
"This tool can be used anywhere and on any device."
"The most valuable features of this solution are workflow and reporting."
"It should just have the integration with Jira. We haven't looked at it since Atlassian bought the product."
"The CACD solutions on JIRA has some plugins, but they are not easily understandable or workable."
"I would love to have more features to make nice documents, like Release Notes or a feature overview, right from JIRA."
"I want the tool to integrate connectors."
"Something I do not like about the new version is that there is a need to browse all the way back to the beginning, should a person click on a task that is specifically for his group and wish to go back and look at the other portfolios or people."
"Jira's collaboration and integration with other apps and tools could be improved."
"The way to configure it can definitely be improved. It is very difficult and complex to configure. Its configuration should be simplified."
"Some of the customizations are definitely a little challenging."
"Of course, the price could always be cheaper."
Earn 20 points
AgileCraft is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews. AgileCraft is rated 7.0, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AgileCraft writes "Linking of PI Objectives with different features was cool, but it didn't have integration with Jira". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". AgileCraft is most compared with Jira Align, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Agree with Duane's comments for the most part. The two tools serve very different purposes. Where I disagree a bit is that Jira can be and is used by very large organizations to manage work. However Jira does not provide support for working across a set of related projects and services. This is what Agile Craft allows you do to - plus AC brings other capabilities like value stream management, a greater level of portfolio and business management, and management of delivery across a large set of programs.
It will definitely be interesting to see where Atlassian takes things.