We performed a comparison between Airlock and AWS WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements."
"We do not have to maintain the solution."
"The customizable features are good."
"The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is the extra layer of security that I have when connecting to my web applications."
"One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services."
"The most valuable feature is the security, making sure that files are protected, preventing unauthorized users from accessing the system."
"AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."
"The tool must be simplified."
"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots"
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while AWS WAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". Airlock is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HUMAN Defense Platform and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.