We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and AWS Auto Scaling based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"It helps us to reduce the cost."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"The product provides self-healing features."
"It can scale."
"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The tool's stability could be improved."
"The tool must include AI features."
"It could be cheaper."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Grafana, Datadog and AppDynamics, whereas AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with . See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Akamai mPulse report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.