We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and Oracle API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management."It is very helpful, with our API-based applications."
"Integrating API Gateway with other AWS services was easy. It worked out of the box, so it worked perfectly."
"Amazon API Gateway facilitates our serverless architecture, particularly with Lambda, by allowing us to perform various tasks. For instance, Lambda functions authorize API calls, execute multiple workloads, and integrate with other services like Azure and Kubernetes. Additionally, we leverage Lambda functions behind the Amazon API Gateway to query databases, process data, and interact with different systems."
"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."
"t is easy for integrations if it is deployed in AWS Services."
"API Gateway offers a multitude of configuration parameters that enable versatile request filtering and protection against potential attacks."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Amazon API Gateway is a very fast solution."
"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."
"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."
"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."
"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."
"Amazon API Gateway needs to focus on minimizing latency."
"The API Gateway lacks the capability to directly facilitate API strategy development or user onboarding workflows."
"A lower price would definitely be an improvement."
"API Gateway lacks some governance features that MuleSoft offers, and there are additional features that could make it even better."
"I am not completely satisfied with Technical Support."
"The integration could be improved."
"We would like to see more UI-based monitoring."
"They could include more support tools in the product."
"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."
"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."
"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."
"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while Oracle API Management is ranked 21st in API Management with 5 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while Oracle API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle API Management writes "Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas Oracle API Management is most compared with Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and IBM API Connect.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.