We performed a comparison between Amazon Neptune and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Managed NoSQL Databases."Relational databases are never good at identifying patterns in graphs or other similar relationships, whereas Amazon Neptune is."
"It is a NoSQL database."
"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is easy to use and implement for application programmers."
"I would recommend Cosmos. It made our lives a lot easier. There's not a big learning curve in order to understand the structure and how to use it."
"The solution is extremely user-friendly and easy to navigate."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"rate Azure support nine out of 10. They respond quickly and will help you manage costs. However, they mainly give you an overview of the issue, so they'll never have an in-depth idea of what you're doing. They aren't the owners of our product, so they don't know much about it, but they can ask you generally: What are you doing? Are you doing too many updates? How can we reduce the cost?"
"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is fast, and its performance is good compared to normal SQL DB."
"The best feature is the velocity to make a query."
"Amazon Neptune could improve by spreading more awareness for others to have an understanding of the solution because the technology is fairly new. The developer community and larger community do not understand it yet."
"The built-in integration of the solution is tight."
"In Microsoft manufacturing, managers really need to know about the product."
"I have to say technical support is not very good as it takes too long. Sometimes it can take them two or three days to respond to your ticket."
"I would like to see Cosmos DB introduce a feature that would convert machine language to human-readable queries."
"It is not as easy to use as DynamoDB."
"The pricing of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings."
"The API compatibility has room for improvement, particularly integration with MongoDB. You have to connect to a specific flavor of MongoDB. We'd also like a richer query capability in line with the latest Mongo features. That is one thing on our wish list. The current version is good enough for our use case, but it could be improved."
"A couple features that would help me in architectural solutions would be customizable architecture or customizable documentation, which both Microsoft Azure or Microsoft Teams can provide."
Earn 20 points
Amazon Neptune is ranked 5th in Managed NoSQL Databases while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is ranked 1st in Managed NoSQL Databases with 38 reviews. Amazon Neptune is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Neptune writes "Useful pattern identification, price well, and straightforward implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "Removes bottlenecks related to databases in our application and works quickly because of reference keys". Amazon Neptune is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Timestream, Neo4j AuraDB and Amazon DocumentDB, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Neo4j AuraDB, Google Cloud Bigtable, Amazon DocumentDB and Amazon Timestream.
See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.