We performed a comparison between Anritsu Oscilloscopes and Keysight Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Oscilloscopes solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It supports the PAM-4 encoding scheme. We use that to do our PAM-4 receiver validation."
"The jitter function included into the system has helped me in terms of improving the capabilities of our product."
"The Pulse Pattern Generator (PPG) and Error Detector are co-located, which makes it easier to use because I can just probe it directly on the PCB."
"The most valuable feature is its frequency range."
"We can extract signal loss, skew, DKDF... and the tool is very flexible."
"It gives you the capability to increase the Tap levels and voltage strength more than what you have in your signal."
"The user interface is easy, simple, and practical."
"The user interface is very user-friendly. You can use a lot of functions in their scope and will provide them for you. You can update the scope's software by asking Keysight to update the software when you want."
"The user interface is very simple. Everyone can use it."
"Its 4 port has true differential with quite a few de-embedding features. It goes up to 40 GHz with high performance."
"We rely on the data and we make our design calls, risk-assessment, all based on the measurements that we take with the Keysight equipment."
"While it depends on the field, the learning curve is usually really quick."
"It does everything that I need it to with the PLTS software and the network analyzer software."
"The user interface has never been better. They improved it a few years ago with a more modern oscilloscope interface and it's easier to use, even for more junior people in our lab."
"Because they're such a big industry standard name, their products are standardized across many customers, which is why people own these products."
"Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis."
"I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies."
"The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement."
"I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot."
"The user interface is a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated."
"I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight."
"Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good."
"There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model."
"They can improve, but I don't know how."
"I would like be able to measure multi-lane simultaneously. Right now, the high-performance jitter solution measures one signal. I would like to capture many at the same time."
"I would like them to build in more high-speed functions, such as FEC or PCIe, built into the array. PERT to be built-in for more specific product call. These would make our lives much easier."
"The user interface can be buggy at times. But I'm an engineer, I figure out how to get around them pretty easily so that's not that much of a concern."
"I would like to see better post-processing data utility tools like a de-embedding."
"The technical support is okay, but sometimes they are on a different page than us. If it is something wrong with the scope, they are okay. However, if something technical goes wrong, like the calibration, it is hard to get the information that we need because it is hard to share everything and explain all the measurements in real-time."
"Some of the models have only two ports. It takes much longer to use a two-port. If they had a four-port, it would be much better."
Anritsu Oscilloscopes is ranked 9th in Oscilloscopes while Keysight Oscilloscopes is ranked 3rd in Oscilloscopes. Anritsu Oscilloscopes is rated 7.8, while Keysight Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Anritsu Oscilloscopes writes "Gives you the capability to increase the voltage strength more than what you have in your signal, but it could use more dynamic features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keysight Oscilloscopes writes "We are able to easily record and save our test setup". Anritsu Oscilloscopes is most compared with Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, whereas Keysight Oscilloscopes is most compared with Tektronix Oscilloscopes, Siglent, RIGOL Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes and National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes. See our Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes report.
See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
