We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Studio Creatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"The initial setup was straightforward and it does not take long to complete."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"The tool is user-friendly."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"The business process management is definitely the most valuable feature. What Creatio ended up doing with their software solution is giving you the power, in your own hands, in a way that is incredibly intuitive and well-structured."
"The low-code tools and business process management that Creatio provides are useful for our internal processes. It is also very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"Creatio also provides us with scalability, performance and agility."
"It is a low-code platform, that is very intuitive."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its CRM functionality and the fact that it is a no-code solution"
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a low-code and no-code platform."
"It enables automating tasks and provides self-service options, ultimately improving efficiency and customer satisfaction."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"It appears that at times, our partners might be using Google Translate, resulting in translations lacking context and not being entirely understandable."
"Numerous options can make implementation confusing."
"Creatio needs to stabilize their marketplace."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
"The way bpm's infrastructure works, you can only have one data source on a page. It has to be connected to the object and you're pretty much locked in at that point... If you want to connect anything other than what exists in that object to that object, you're going to have to create a completely new home for it in that object."
"The mobile version of the solution could be improved. It's hard to customize it."
"HRM is an area where Studio Creatio lacks and needs to improve."
"Studio Creatio is a new product in the market, making its lack of maturity an area of concern."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Studio Creatio is ranked 26th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Studio Creatio is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Studio Creatio writes "Leveraging process automation and advanced tools for streamlined operations". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas Studio Creatio is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, Mendix, Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems and Bizagi. See our Apache Airflow vs. Studio Creatio report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
