Apache Flink vs Google Cloud Dataflow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
10,053 views|6,824 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Google Logo
4,704 views|3,907 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Flink and Google Cloud Dataflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Flink vs. Google Cloud Dataflow Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This is truly a real-time solution.""With Flink, it provides out-of-the-box checkpointing and state management. It helps us in that way. When Storm used to restart, sometimes we would lose messages. With Flink, it provides guaranteed message processing, which helped us. It also helped us with maintenance or restarts.""Apache Flink allows you to reduce latency and process data in real-time, making it ideal for such scenarios.""It is user-friendly and the reporting is good.""Apache Flink is meant for low latency applications. You take one event opposite if you want to maintain a certain state. When another event comes and you want to associate those events together, in-memory state management was a key feature for us.""It provides us the flexibility to deploy it on any cluster without being constrained by cloud-based limitations.""The documentation is very good.""Apache Flink's best feature is its data streaming tool."

More Apache Flink Pros →

"The service is relatively cheap compared to other batch-processing engines.""The best feature of Google Cloud Dataflow is its practical connectedness.""The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are scalability and connectivity.""The support team is good and it's easy to use.""The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.""It is a scalable solution.""Google Cloud Dataflow is useful for streaming and data pipelines.""I don't need a server running all the time while using the tool. It is also easy to setup. The product offers a pay-as-you-go service."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Pros →

Cons
"Amazon's CloudFormation templates don't allow for direct deployment in the private subnet.""Apache Flink should improve its data capability and data migration.""In terms of improvement, there should be better reporting. You can integrate with reporting solutions but Flink doesn't offer it themselves.""PyFlink is not as fully featured as Python itself, so there are some limitations to what you can do with it.""There is a learning curve. It takes time to learn.""In terms of stability with Flink, it is something that you have to deal with every time. Stability is the number one problem that we have seen with Flink, and it really depends on the kind of problem that you're trying to solve.""There is room for improvement in the initial setup process.""The machine learning library is not very flexible."

More Apache Flink Cons →

"The technical support has slight room for improvement.""Google Cloud Dataflow should include a little cost optimization.""I would like Google Cloud Dataflow to be integrated with IT data flow and other related services to make it easier to use as it is a complex tool.""There are certain challenges regarding the Google Cloud Composer which can be improved.""Google Cloud Data Flow can improve by having full simple integration with Kafka topics. It's not that complicated, but it could improve a bit. The UI is easy to use but the experience could be better. There are other tools available that do a better job.""When I deploy the product in local errors, a lot of errors pop up which are not always caught. The solution's error logging is bad. It can take a lot of time to debug the errors. It needs to have better logs.""The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The deployment time could also be reduced."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an open-source platform that can be used free of charge."
  • "The solution is open-source, which is free."
  • "Apache Flink is open source so we pay no licensing for the use of the software."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "It's an open source."
  • More Apache Flink Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution depends on many factors, such as how they pay for tools in the company and its size."
  • "Google Cloud is slightly cheaper than AWS."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • "Google Cloud Dataflow is a cheap solution."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Google Cloud Dataflow's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."
  • "The solution is not very expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Dataflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product helps us to create both simple and complex data processing tasks. Over time, it has facilitated integration and navigation across multiple data sources tailored to each client's needs. We… more »
    Top Answer:Flink is free, it's open source. Flink is open source.
    Top Answer:Apache Flink should improve its data capability and data migration.
    Top Answer:The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.
    Top Answer:The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. For some common users, the solution's authentication part is difficult to use. The scalability of the… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 39 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    10,053
    Comparisons
    6,824
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    423
    Rating
    7.7
    7th
    out of 39 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    4,704
    Comparisons
    3,907
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    308
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Flink
    Google Dataflow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Apache Flink is an open-source batch and stream data processing engine. It can be used for batch, micro-batch, and real-time processing. Flink is a programming model that combines the benefits of batch processing and streaming analytics by providing a unified programming interface for both data sources, allowing users to write programs that seamlessly switch between the two modes. It can also be used for interactive queries.

    Flink can be used as an alternative to MapReduce for executing iterative algorithms on large datasets in parallel. It was developed specifically for large to extremely large data sets that require complex iterative algorithms.

    Flink is a fast and reliable framework developed in Java, Scala, and Python. It runs on the cluster that consists of data nodes and managers. It has a rich set of features that can be used out of the box in order to build sophisticated applications.

    Flink has a robust API and is ready to be used with Hadoop, Cassandra, Hive, Impala, Kafka, MySQL/MariaDB, Neo4j, as well as any other NoSQL database.

    Apache Flink Features

    • Distributed execution of streaming programs on clusters of computers
    • Support for multiple data sources and sinks: this includes Hadoop file systems, databases, and other data sources
    • Streaming SQL query engine with support for windowing functions
    • Low latency query execution in milliseconds
    • Runs in a distributed fashion: it can be deployed on multiple machines or nodes to increase performance and reliability of data processing pipelines.
    • Powerful API that supports both batch and streaming applications
    • Runs on clusters of commodity hardware with minimal configuration
    • Can be integrated with other technologies, such as Apache Spark for complex data mining

    Apache Flink Benefits

    • Ease of use: Flink has an intuitive API and provides high-level abstractions for handling data streams. Even beginners in the field can work with the platform with ease.
    • Fault tolerance: Flink can automatically detect and recover from failures in the system.
    • Scalability: Flink scales to thousands of nodes. It can run on clusters of any size and the user does not have to worry about managing the cluster.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Apache Flink stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its low latency and its user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    The head of data and analytics at a computer software company notes, “The top feature of Apache Flink is its low latency for fast, real-time data. Another great feature is the real-time indicators and alerts which make a big difference when it comes to data processing and analysis.”

    Ertugrul A., manager at a computer software company, writes, “It's usable and affordable. It is user-friendly and the reporting is good.

    Google Dataflow is a unified programming model and a managed service for developing and executing a wide range of data processing patterns including ETL, batch computation, and continuous computation. Cloud Dataflow frees you from operational tasks like resource management and performance optimization.
    Sample Customers
    LogRhythm, Inc., Inter-American Development Bank, Scientific Technologies Corporation, LotLinx, Inc., Benevity, Inc.
    Absolutdata, Backflip Studios, Bluecore, Claritics, Crystalloids, Energyworx, GenieConnect, Leanplum, Nomanini, Redbus, Streak, TabTale
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Flink vs. Google Cloud Dataflow
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Flink vs. Google Cloud Dataflow and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Flink is ranked 5th in Streaming Analytics with 15 reviews while Google Cloud Dataflow is ranked 7th in Streaming Analytics with 10 reviews. Apache Flink is rated 7.6, while Google Cloud Dataflow is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache Flink writes "A great solution with an intricate system and allows for batch data processing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Dataflow writes "Easy to use for programmers, user-friendly, and scalable". Apache Flink is most compared with Spring Cloud Data Flow, Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, Azure Stream Analytics and Informatica Data Engineering Streaming, whereas Google Cloud Dataflow is most compared with Databricks, Apache NiFi, Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis and Informatica Data Engineering Streaming. See our Apache Flink vs. Google Cloud Dataflow report.

    See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.