Apache Spark vs Spark SQL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,346 views|1,845 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
1,485 views|998 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Spark SQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. Spark SQL Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its ease of use.""The features we find most valuable are the machine learning, data learning, and Spark Analytics.""The product is useful for analytics.""The good performance. The nice graphical management console. The long list of ML algorithms.""The product's deployment phase is easy.""The most valuable feature is the Fault Tolerance and easy binding with other processes like Machine Learning, graph analytics.""ETL and streaming capabilities.""It is highly scalable, allowing you to efficiently work with extensive datasets that might be problematic to handle using traditional tools that are memory-constrained."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"This solution is useful to leverage within a distributed ecosystem.""The speed of getting data.""Overall the solution is excellent.""The stability was fine. It behaved as expected.""It is a stable solution.""Spark SQL's efficiency in managing distributed data and its simplicity in expressing complex operations make it an essential part of our data pipeline.""I find the Thrift connection valuable.""The performance is one of the most important features. It has an API to process the data in a functional manner."

More Spark SQL Pros →

Cons
"It would be beneficial to enhance Spark's capabilities by incorporating models that utilize features not traditionally present in its framework.""Its UI can be better. Maintaining the history server is a little cumbersome, and it should be improved. I had issues while looking at the historical tags, which sometimes created problems. You have to separately create a history server and run it. Such things can be made easier. Instead of separately installing the history server, it can be made a part of the whole setup so that whenever you set it up, it becomes available.""I would like to see integration with data science platforms to optimize the processing capability for these tasks.""This solution currently cannot support or distribute neural network related models, or deep learning related algorithms. We would like this functionality to be developed.""When you first start using this solution, it is common to run into memory errors when you are dealing with large amounts of data.""The solution needs to optimize shuffling between workers.""It requires overcoming a significant learning curve due to its robust and feature-rich nature.""It should support more programming languages."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"There should be better integration with other solutions.""It would be beneficial for aggregate functions to include a code block or toolbox that explains its calculations or supported conditional statements.""SparkUI could have more advanced versions of the performance and the queries and all.""In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL.""I've experienced some incompatibilities when using the Delta Lake format.""Anything to improve the GUI would be helpful.""It takes a bit of time to get used to using this solution versus Pandas as it has a steep learning curve.""Being a new user, I am not able to find out how to partition it correctly. I probably need more information or knowledge. In other database solutions, you can easily optimize all partitions. I haven't found a quicker way to do that in Spark SQL. It would be good if you don't need a partition here, and the system automatically partitions in the best way. They can also provide more educational resources for new users."

More Spark SQL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is open-sourced and free."
  • "There is no license or subscription for this solution."
  • "The solution is bundled with Palantir Foundry at no extra charge."
  • "The on-premise solution is quite expensive in terms of hardware, setting up the cluster, memory, hardware and resources. It depends on the use case, but in our case with a shared cluster which is quite large, it is quite expensive."
  • "We use the open-source version, so we do not have direct support from Apache."
  • "We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small."
  • More Spark SQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:Spark SQL's efficiency in managing distributed data and its simplicity in expressing complex operations make it an essential part of our data pipeline.
    Top Answer:We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small.
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL. There could be additional features that I haven't explored but the current solution for working… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,346
    Comparisons
    1,845
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    4th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    1,485
    Comparisons
    998
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    543
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data processing. Unlike the basic Spark RDD API, the interfaces provided by Spark SQL provide Spark with more information about the structure of both the data and the computation being performed. There are several ways to interact with Spark SQL including SQL and the Dataset API. When computing a result the same execution engine is used, independent of which API/language you are using to express the computation. This unification means that developers can easily switch back and forth between different APIs based on which provides the most natural way to express a given transformation.
    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, Hitachi Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    University8%
    Construction Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Spark vs. Spark SQL
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Spark SQL and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while Spark SQL is ranked 4th in Hadoop with 14 reviews. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Spark SQL is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spark SQL writes "Offers the flexibility to handle large-scale data processing". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, SAP HANA, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Azure Stream Analytics, whereas Spark SQL is most compared with IBM Db2 Big SQL, Netezza Analytics, SAP HANA and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric. See our Apache Spark vs. Spark SQL report.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.