We performed a comparison between Apigee and Postman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A simple platform that's easier to work with than IBM API Connect. Support for it is really good and gives it advantage over other providers."
"The analytics feature is quite good."
"Apigee provides out-of-the-box policies, so it is ready to use with minimal configuration to those policies. You can govern your API and manage the life cycle of the API completely with the Apigee tool."
"It's a good return on my investment."
"Apigee is a strong-featured solution. It leads in Gartner Quadrant ratings and it is a full-slated API solution that has the features that an API gateway requires."
"The most important feature is the security capabilities and the way it integrates very quickly with other security providers. We have integrated it with Azure and it integrates quite seamlessly."
"The developer portal is very useful to customers."
"Highly scalable from any initial topology to horizontal extension"
"Good at simulating the API code from a fictitious client application to check API behavior."
"It allowed us to understand the working and performance of the APIs."
"The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution."
"The solution provides visibility for PDF reports without needing to install plugins."
"It is easy and simple to use and install. It is compatible with Linux, Mac or Windows."
"The product is easy to implement."
"Postman is useful for API testing."
"I have enjoyed using parameters and setting parameters while powering directly."
"The number one area this solution could be improved is by implementing support. Support is not a part of this solution."
"The developer portal's adoption of the OpenAPI standard needs to be improved. In the latest version of the developer portal, they have adopted the OpenAPI standard. This feature, however, can be improved by supporting more characteristics of the OpenAPI standard."
"Drag and drop of features would be more beneficial, rather than manually working on the configuration and updates."
"The initial setup is not straightforward, particularly for hybrid solutions."
"The cost of the solution is quite high."
"They need to work on the cost of the solution."
"Apigee could do more to make users aware of what is available in the add-ons."
"An area for improvement would be to provide more information while troubleshooting."
"I would like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"Version management could be simplified."
"If you have knowledge of JavaScript, the initial setup is easy and straightforward. If not, it may take some time to learn about JavaScript before starting the implementation."
"It should be able to check the records and compare them to the regression testing more on the automation side."
"The scalability of the solution can be improved."
"There is no support for the testing of the SOAP APIs."
"UI testing needs to be added to the solution."
"I live in Turkey, so for me, the value of dollar currency is high...Postman can change its pricing policy and decrease the prices for Turkey."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while Postman is ranked 9th in API Management with 52 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while Postman is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Postman writes "Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and 3scale API Management, whereas Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Parasoft SOAtest. See our Apigee vs. Postman report.
See our list of best API Management vendors and best API Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
