We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With real-time packet capture features, you can easily and quickly response."
"The product allows us to check real-time progress, including latency and network activities."
"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer."
"It provides packet capture and we can block or whitelist whichever IPs we need to. Whatever traffic we want to block - and we get IPs from internal teams and from national teams - we block at the Arbor level only, because if it gets to the firewall then firewall bandwidth will be taken."
"It's just one dashboard with mitigation. You decide which mitigation you want and at what threshold to do this or that. Its operation is pretty simple. It's easy."
"We can reduce the bandwidth to minimize the attack level. If we see more than 2.5 GBs we drop it directly."
"The solution is easy to use."
"We use it not only for DDoS detection and protection, but we also use it for traffic analysis and capacity planning as well. We've also been able to extend the use of it to other security measures within our company, the front-line defense, not only for DDoS, but for any kind of scanning malware that may be picked up. It's also used for outbound attacks, which has helped us mitigate those and lower our bandwidth costs..."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"All of our traffic has to pass through the appliance, so we can very quickly mitigate the attack. This is a very valuable feature. On top of that, it's not only volumetric attack protection that the solution offers, but also layer 7 attack protection as well."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"Its functionality is very good."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"Arbor DDoS could improve out-of-the-box reporting, it could be better."
"The solution needs to enhance its features to compete with other tools."
"The implementation should be made easier."
"On the application layer, they could have a better distributed traffic flow. They could improve that a bit. For network data it is very effective, but the application layer can be improved."
"Arbor Pravail APS devices do not sync features or config the backup enough. This needs to be improved."
"We need a SaaS model for the solution."
"Sometimes it blocks legitimate traffic. If a legitimate user is trying to access the server continuously, the product suspects that this is a DoS traffic file. That is a case where it needs to improve. It needs machine-learning."
"The solution's IT support needs improvement."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard. Right now, you are required to buy tools in order to have graphical representation for your monitoring."
"It would be ideal if they could expand protocol support to cover emerging communication standards and ensure comprehensive protection against diverse attack vectors."
"There's room for improvement in the clarity of the feedback provided by the command service in the CLI."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 46 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 4th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 23 reviews. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "A critical solution for security, as it includes features that can automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Arbor DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Corero, Imperva DDoS, A10 Thunder TPS and Fortinet FortiDDoS, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and F5 Silverline Managed Services. See our Arbor DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.