We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"It is one of the best products available in the market."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"It is a pretty solid product for the type that it is representing. It is a CM solution as compared to Splunk or ArcSight from HP. It is also user friendly. It comes with some internal AI as well, in which it automatically maps multiple lots from unrelated devices and makes a smart decision to link them back and create an offense based on that. It is a smart tool."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with the GRD, for banking."
"It is suitable for large companies with critical infrastructure. For our clients, robustness, availability at a high level, and the level of references and experiences connected to the solution are important."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"Most of our clients are interested in automation. The automation part is good because they are able to detect threats and vulnerabilities in real time. It's very fast."
"We are using the platform version, which I like."
"It saves a lot of time. We integrate the customer's firewall with all their networking devices."
"Overall a great solution."
"We find that the search and access functionality is quite slow."
"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."
"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."
"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"I would like the rule creation interface to be much more user-friendly in the next release."
"The dashboard and reports are not user-friendly or efficient so are of little help with threat hunting activity."
"QRadar needs a lot of fine tuning"
"I need a solution which will send alerts in the event of any behavior."
"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."
"IBM QRadar has outdated technology, and this is its area for improvement. When you try to implement an analytic expression, it's not updated. The solution doesn't support newer technologies, and it doesn't update regularly. For example, around the world, others implement new technologies, while IBM updates later than others."
"Some UI enhancements would be nice, such as exporting custom event properties and the ability to export rules."
"Technical support could be improved by a bit."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 20th in Log Management with 31 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and syslog-ng, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Securonix Next-Gen SIEM. See our ArcSight Logger vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.