We performed a comparison between Ardoq and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for this solution is the automatic updating and propagation of changes across the system."
"The most valuable features of MEGA HOPEX are the seamless VPA module and the good user experience. There are built-in connections that provide integration with other platforms, such as ServiceNow. There is a lot of customization available allowing a lot of freedom. The solution is updated frequently adding new features. For example, the feature GraphQL can be integrated into other solutions, such as ManageEngine for ITSM solutions. You are able to use GraphQL to connect APIs and query the APIs."
"The most valuable feature is the completeness of HOPEX's meta-model. It's a strong meta-model that's rigid but comprehensive. It's a logical fit for our understanding of how we want things modeled in our database."
"What's most valuable in MEGA HOPEX is that it follows the reference model where each component is defined. I also like the diagram consistency in MEGA HOPEX."
"An advantage is its accessibility."
"The most valuable parts of this solution are the richness of its features and its easy interface."
"This is a complete package with all of the functionality that we need."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."
"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"The interface must be improved."
"It takes a long time to learn how to use HOPEX. It's hard to work with it because the user interface is bad. For example, if you want to build a complex system diagram, you need a lot of knowledge to do this correctly and make it readable. In MEGA, you need to create a report and it takes a long time to publish it. The publishing is offline. With RDoC, everything is online."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"This product is expensive and would be improved by lowering its price."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"The training materials and learning process need improvement."
"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."
Ardoq is ranked 12th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 37 reviews. Ardoq is rated 7.6, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". Ardoq is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, OrbusInfinity and ADOIT, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and BiZZdesign HoriZZon. See our Ardoq vs. MEGA HOPEX report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.