We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and QPR ProcessDesigner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's basic features are easy to use, overall designed well, and it has good process mining analysis."
"The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"ARIS Reporting – Helps download valuable content from the tool in multiple formats."
"The capability to integrate all information of the business and to generate simulations of processes. It can analyze the model of operations quickly."
"The most valuable features are business process modeling and reporting."
"Platform that it supports covers legacy and new. Caters to moving older objects into an integrated DB, relatively popular ones: SQL, Oracle, etc."
"One of the many advantages of ARIS is that it is supported by a very strong BPM community, which is critical for us. Although it has been in business for many years, it is still at an early stage of evolution. There are so many instances where your specific use case or requirement for using ARIS hasn't necessarily been matured across the sector. So, you need access to a very active community to help you explore possible solutions and ways in which ARIS can be used to achieve those use cases."
"I like everything about ARIS BPA. I've used it for a long time and it's a fantastic tool. There is a list of things ARIS has that other solutions do not have."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"Needs flexibility in automation of the modeling processes and real-time analysis of data, not just a static view."
"It needs external API and the ability to navigate back, similar to "Back" in web browser."
"The integration between ARIS, webMethods, and project versions needs improvement."
"There should be a more intuitive tool when creating reports."
"There are reports available in ARIS and you can modify them a bit if you want something more specific, but it's not that easy to adjust them and make modifications. It would be nice to have some kind of tool to do that, something that is more user-friendly for people who are not too technical, so that they could create reports the way they want them."
"They should make improvements as per customer requirements."
"One of the biggest challenges is to realistically enable the defined structures of the processes that you have in ARIS documented, and then actually implement them in the business."
"ARIS needs to make a better user interface. The user interface sucks. The problem with ARIS is that they have two interfaces for the same product."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
Earn 20 points
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bizagi, whereas QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our ARIS BPA vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.