We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The setup is simple."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba ClearPass is its ease of use and the GUI is user-friendly."
"Its clustering model saved us staff time and reduced errors by eliminating the need to manage individual RADIUS servers."
"It's very easy to access support and the documentation is self-explanatory."
"Authentication capabilities are one of the most valuable features."
"It's a great solution with multi-vendor support. That's always useful."
"Gives us network access control, visibility, scalability, security, and control in what is becoming an uncontrollable, inundated BYOD and IoT world."
"The most valuable thing about Aruba ClearPass is its ease of use. It has always been a very reliable and very stable policy management platform."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"I can't think of an area where the solution is lacking a feature or a capability."
"Aruba ClearPass has a complex pricing scheme, so that's an area for improvement. The process for setting up Aruba ClearPass also needs improvement. It could be easier."
"Some functions could be improved."
"After HP, their support is the worst."
"I would like to see better integration with the firewall for zeroing out blacklisted users."
"The solution needs to upgrade its user interface. Right now, it's not so user friendly, and it's an aspect that my clients' wish was improved upon."
"Configuration should be more easy to understand between the link of two topics."
"Like most security products, ClearPass is difficult to deploy. You need to use the CLI to implement security products from any vendor, so configuring the authentication is complicated."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Varonis Platform, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.