We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the GUI and its ease-to-do configuration. Additionally, we can troubleshoot many things in one window."
"The customized modules for guests, the self-registration and login, one license for all, no license for guest users, and the self-integration of sandbox integration are the most valuable features."
"Document authentications allows us to decide which users can connect to an office VLAN and this has been the most valuable feature."
"Aruba is a highly scalable product. It just works. We have no issues with scalability."
"The setup is simple."
"The interface is very easy to use and the workflow is quite straightforward."
"If you are looking at the base installation, then it was a very straightforward process, which I would rate an eight or nine out of ten."
"We find that at the end of the projects we manage, all functionalities perform quite well. We've tested it a lot and find it to be overall a very good solution."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"The implementation can improve because it is challenging to explain some of the concepts to the client."
"I can't think of an area where the solution is lacking a feature or a capability."
"The scalability could improve."
"This solution could be improved by making it possible to use it across different territories. Currently, if a user moves from the US to the UK, their usage and access will be restricted."
"If you look at the tool's deployment phase from a fine-tuning perspective, I feel it was very complex."
"They should include SMP functionalities."
"The improvement can be in the cloud area. They can improve it for the cloud so that we can deploy it on the cloud."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the user interface, it is a bit chunky."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and ExtremeControl, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC and Forescout Platform. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.