We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Freshdesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Knowledge Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have found limiting permissions and history very valuable."
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"The solution is stable."
"This is a scalable solution that supports thousands of users."
"Confluence can link any ticket or task from JIRA to be included on the Confluence page."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"What I like the most is the Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"I like that it's very user-friendly. The way they designed this application, any layperson can just do some drag and drop actions and use it. It's not that difficult. It's also easy to implement. The most important thing is, you don't need to go to this application to create a ticket. You just send out an email, and the ticket is created automatically. I have never seen a feature like this before."
"The most valuable features of Freshdesk are the automation of tickets to assign them to different agents, and the managing of documents is easy."
"The UI is easy to use."
"It generated reports for us, which helped us identify the status of requests and the aging of requests."
"Its simplicity is most valuable. It is easy and simple, and it requires negligible training effort. I don't spend all my time goofing around trying to find stuff in the ticketing system."
"Omnichannel is one of the most valuable features of the solution."
"It is quite easy to program custom apps and integrate them."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the way that it connects to various folders especially because we use it as a CRM tool. We can connect it with our phones and our chat, and also with the API and have it as an email service. Freshdesk just makes our life easier."
"I would like to see the text editor upgraded from its current limited abilities."
"Atlassian Confluence is not really a community-friendly solution."
"This is kind of by design, however, the lack of control in terms of editing the page to make it look the way you want it to look is an issue. It would be nice if there was more flexibility there."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"Atlassian Confluence should improve the interface, it needs to be more user-friendly. It is easy to use, but it could be more intuitive."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"Confluence could incorporate stronger records management and automation features. The current management structure is too open, which becomes an issue."
"There is room for improvement in maybe the tree structure for articles. If you have a lot of articles, it becomes difficult to navigate."
"Sometimes our requirements are not matched with Freshdesk's free version as most of the advanced features are not available to us."
"I would like to see a little bit more color in the solution."
"For integrations, we need to write code that communicates with their system in order to enable certain functionality in the system. This is a lot of work for their customers."
"Having so many tags makes everyday work a lot more complicated, and a lot more time-consuming."
"It should enhance its service and its reporting capabilities."
"Technical support is not the best. It could be much, much better and offer better support to users."
"There aren't any features that we want to enhance, but we need to mature in our usage of some of them. I can't say any feature is missing or needs improvement, but a tool's built-in features need to evolve customer feedback. We have a dialogue set up for that kind of feedback."
"Freshdesk could improve its capabilities. It's missing the article formatting, and the overall look and feel make it not easy to use. The administration instructions on how to manage the automation, capability, and integration with third parties, such as chat or bots, are very important in these types of solutions."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 1st in Knowledge Management Software with 99 reviews while Freshdesk is ranked 3rd in Knowledge Management Software with 27 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Freshdesk is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Freshdesk writes "Incredibly user-friendly, flexible, and affordable". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas Freshdesk is most compared with JIRA Service Management, ServiceNow, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Spiceworks and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Freshdesk report.
See our list of best Knowledge Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Knowledge Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.