We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."
"The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users."
"We use CA Workload Automation AE r11.3.6 to automate enterprise-wide scheduling and file transfers using an FTP plugin."
"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."
"To me, what's most valuable in AutoSys Workload Automation is its robustness and quickness. The tool can trigger jobs within a few milliseconds, and it can handle large volumes of jobs."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."
"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."
"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"The interface needs some improvements."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.