We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and GoCD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"The integrations are good."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The UI is colorful."
"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."
"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"The tool must be more user-friendly."
"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."
"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while GoCD is ranked 10th in Build Automation with 6 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while GoCD is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoCD writes "User-friendly, useful multiple pipeline capabilities, and low resource consumption". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins and GitHub Actions, whereas GoCD is most compared with GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions and Tekton. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.