We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Huawei Cloud WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to integrate central sets. It protects from intrusion attacks such as scripting and SQL injections."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes."
"Rule groups are valuable."
"AWS WAF has a lot of integrated features and services. For example, there are security services that can be integrated very well for our customers."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Cloud WAF is its ease of use."
"In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"We don't have much control over blocking, because the WAF is managed by AWS."
"AWS WAF would be better if it uses AI or machine learning to detect a potential attack or a potential IP that creates an attack even before it happens. I want AWS WAF to capture the IP and automatically write the rule to automate the entire process."
"I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps."
"The solution can improve its price."
"It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security."
"The cost must be reduced."
"It would be good if the solution's feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Huawei Cloud WAF is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Huawei Cloud WAF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Cloud WAF writes "Easy to use, but its feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Huawei Cloud WAF is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.