We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are related to managing Kubernetes cluster nodes."
"It is very easy to learn and apply to other things."
"The product is easy to use."
"For hybrid cloud operations, the seamless transition it enables is key. Most enterprises have a lot of workloads on-premises, and they want a smooth way to move into the cloud. Some things are on-prem, and some things are on the cloud. Azure Stack bridges that gap with solutions that work well for their existing on-premises infrastructure."
"Azure offers a wide range of services, catering to various needs."
"Azure Stack is a good product because it's flexible and easy to work with."
"In general, it provides the flexibility for configuration for bigger teams."
"Azure is less complex and easier to use than AWS."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The solution can scale well."
"The scalability is good."
"The solution could be less expensive."
"It would be great if Azure Stack would enable VDI creation and positive and negative artificial intelligence."
"The fact that it is completely integrated into Azure, while positive, is also a downside."
"As opposed to AWS, Azure is a costly solution. It's on par with AWS more than anything else."
"Technical support is very poor. When we meet Microsoft in the coming weeks to discuss expansion, we'll be speaking to them directly about this."
"The user interface could be more user friendly."
"There should be more focus on the user interface, specifically for the management console."
"There are some minor issues or bugs with it that I know are there."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."
"The pricing can be better."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 61 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 6th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 9 reviews. Azure Stack is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Azure Stack is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Google Anthos and VMware Software Defined Data Center, whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Azure Stack vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.