We performed a comparison between Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it can be fully integrated with Microsoft solutions and it doesn't impact the productivity order."
"In terms of features, the querying is great."
"Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow."
"Vulnerability data, network data and the like, are part of correlation and detection."
"The threat protection network is the most valuable feature, because when you get an offense, you can actually trace it back to where it originated from, how it originated, and why."
"QRadar UBA's most valuable feature is the risk rating of users depending on their behavior."
"The feature that I find the most useful is that IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is free of charge. It's a fully free product that can be installed on top of IBM QRadar SIEM."
"Technical support is good overall."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is it has very good data correlation."
"The tool helps with infrastructure, application, and network monitoring."
"The customer service and support could improve their approach to questioning issues. They tend to ask questions one at a time, which creates a lot of back-and-forth communication."
"The pricing could be improved. It needs to be reduced."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"Needs better visualization options beyond the time series charts and a few other options that they have."
"QVM is another instance where they need to revise the vulnerability scoring and the proper remediation details."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"I would also like to see more integration with other vendors. IBM doesn't integrate well with products from China, like Huawei. Many Middle Eastern customers are switching to Huawei from American vendors like Cisco because of the price. In most RFPs, Huawei wins because it costs less."
"The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface."
"The user interface is a bit difficult to get used to."
"The playbook guide which specifies the rules for security use cases needs to be provided to support in case the organization needs help."
More Change Auditor for Windows File Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is ranked 55th in Log Management with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is rated 9.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Change Auditor for Windows File Servers writes "Provides granular queries of security logs and real-time alerting helps me mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is most compared with Quest InTrust, Wazuh and Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.