We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Netskope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."This product provides a really nice visualization of the infrastructure, including network topology, firewalls, etc."
"The feature that I value the most about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is the possibility of checking compliance with different standards. This compliance check can be performed for each subscription or service that we have on all the different cloud providers that we use."
"The comprehensive security for IaaS and PaaS cloud assets provides efficient security awareness to all the teams."
"Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is posture management, which gives you complete visibility of all your assets in the cloud and allows you to do governance and compliance."
"Technical support is good. They are very helpful and quick to resolve any issues we have."
"A feature that was valuable was the built-in website classification or safety ratings. Different websites would be rated according to analyses that the Netskope team had done, and we built policies on some of those scores. If the website scored less than a certain percentage, then we would have a different user experience around how the site would interact with the clients."
"It is a very scalable tool."
"The detection capability is very nice and lightweight."
"The feature that I like best is the GUI."
"The most useful feature of this solution is Cloud Control, which allows me to schedule cloud uploads."
"Netskope is an efficient, reliable, and easy-to-manage solution."
"They are very good at CASB as compared to other players."
"The Check Point solution is somewhat expensive."
"The impact analysis that they perform can be improved. It is currently lacking. It should be more detailed."
"I’d like to see more integration with third-party tools. For example, it would be helpful to have an integration between Dome9 and ServiceNow to manage security incidents and security changes."
"The security of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could improve. There are always new security issues coming out."
"The biggest thing is the documentation aspect of Dome9 is a little lacking. They were purchased by Check Point about a year and a half to two years ago. When they integrated into Check Point's support system, a lot of the documentation that they had previously got mangled in the transition, e.g., linking to stuff on the Dome9 website that no longer exists. There are still a lot of spaces with incomplete links and stuff that is not as fully explained as it could be."
"One feature of the product that I would like to enhance is the possibility to connect to vulnerability management platforms so that the issues that emerge from the scans can then be ingested directly into the vulnerability management process."
"The tool has a lot of potential, but today, it lacks a lot of Scripts/Bots for Azure."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."
"Netskope needs to improve its stability."
"They could add endpoint security features."
"Compatibility with other proxy polars would be helpful."
"I would like to have an identity theft protection function."
"There could be better integration with other solutions."
"The configuration and user behaviour analytics can be improved."
"There could be room for improvement in the subscription process."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Vulnerability Management with 64 reviews while Netskope is ranked 4th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 35 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Netskope is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope writes "Network proxy that provides visibility during deployment and allows you to control PII". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Netskope is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Internet Access, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Cisco Umbrella and Forcepoint ONE.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.