We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Symantec Storage Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)."It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"When creating cloud infrastructure, Cloud Native Security evaluates the cloud security parameters and how they will impact the organization's risk. It lets us know whether our security parameter conforms to international industry standards. It alerts us about anything that increases our risk, so we can address those vulnerabilities and prevent attacks."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"The mean time to detect has been reduced."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The most valuable feature of PingSafe is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
"Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment."
"The Compliance engine has helped put our auditors and senior executives at ease, as we can quickly and accurately measure ourselves against hundreds of compliance checks to include CIS benchmarks, PCI, and other best practices."
"The reporting against compliance is an important feature that helps you comply with policies and standards within your organization."
"We know the vulnerability in advance, so we can take some action for that vulnerability."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"Good interface and visibility."
"The posture management and remediation features are the most valuable. We use GSL Builder to build custom rules in alignment with our organization's policies. CloudGuard has canned rules using multiple standard frameworks, but we also have additional rules."
"The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the advanced firewall and malware prevention."
"I'd like to see better onboarding documentation."
"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"I want PingSafe to integrate additional third-party resources. For example, PingSafe is compatible with Azure and AWS, but Azure AD isn't integrated with AWS. If PingSafe had that ability, it would enrich the data because how users interact with our AWS environment is crucial. All the identity-related features require improvement."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security."
"There should be more documentation about the product."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."
"CloudGuard CNAPP could be enhanced by increasing the number of components that run natively on Azure."
"Automatic remediation requires read/write access. When providing read/write access to third-party applications, this can add risk. It should have some options of triggering API calls to the cloud platform, which in turn, can make the required changes."
"The costs are really high if you want the entire capabilities of the platform."
"I would like to see some AI on the back-end, just to assist with doing analysis and making recommendations."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"Their service needs improvement."
"They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well."
"One of the areas that this solution can be improved is in Behavioural monitoring."
More Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 63 reviews while Symantec Storage Protection is ranked 34th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Symantec Storage Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Storage Protection writes "Good technical support, secures our services and mobile devices against malware". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Symantec Storage Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
