We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."
"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."
"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."
"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time."
"It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."
"The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected."
"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"The code coverage feature is very good."
"We use this solution for qualitative coding. We make use of the SonarLint plugin as well as the dashboard."
"Issue Explanations: Documentation with detailed samples. Helps in growing technical knowledge and re-writing logic to conforming solutions."
"The most valuable features are the analysis and detection of issues within the application code."
"I follow Quality Gate's graduation model within organization, and it is extremely helpful for me to benchmark products."
"The initial setup is simple. It requires some security, but it's simple."
"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."
"SonarQube is useful for controlling all of our Azure task tracking and scanning."
"I have faced issues with the tool's blocking aspects. It is hard to open or block web services due to the multitude of cloud centers. I have to do the process manually at times. We have a bug which is hard to solve."
"They need improved latency in the main window."
"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."
"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."
"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."
"CloudGuard could improve in areas such as ease of integration with Fortinet and reducing costs associated with deployment in cloud environments like Azure."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."
"There needs to be a shareable reporting piece or something we can click and generate easily."
"When we have a thousand products published over it, we expect it to be more efficient in terms of serving requests from the browser."
"From a reporting perspective, we sometimes have problems interpreting the vulnerability scan reports. For example, if it finds a possible threat, our analysts have to manually check the provided reports, and sometimes we have issues getting all the data needed to properly verify if it's accurate or not."
"Currently requires multiple tools, lacking one overall tool."
"The product's user documentation can be vastly improved."
"The solution could improve by having better-consulting services."
"The reporting is good, but I am not able to download a specific report as a PDF, so downloading reports is something that should be looked at."
"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with Checkmarx One, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. SonarQube report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
