Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point IPS and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The possibility of customizing the rules is great.""There's an automatic update after every 2 hours which makes sure that the database is up to date and providing zero-day vulnerability protection.""The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules.""It is also worth noting that many IPS signature comes with detailed background about the vulnerability, and potentially how the vulnerability would affect the network security.""The solution's IPS functionality and firewall functionality are the solution's most valuable features.""Among its great features is the ability to detect outgoing malware or extraction of compromised data and stop it, thus safeguarding us by isolating the network, the equipment, or the identity of the affected users.""The autonomous threat prevention is very easy to use. The APIs and SmartConsole tool also work well.""It offers robust protection with features such as Next Generation firewall capabilities, mobile solutions, and proactive threat prevention."

More Check Point IPS Pros →

"It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked.""The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds.""One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection.""I like the solution's interface.""The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good.""We are currently using the URL filtering feature, which is the most popular.""It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service.""For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pros →

Cons
"The hardware-based version of Check Point IPS could be more scalable. Right now, it's not scalable.""What I would like to improve in IPS would be the capacity of the hardware. I would also like to be able to sort signatures by severity. This would greatly impact how well I can manage my environment.""I am not aware of a preview channel or some repository to have a preview on upcoming signatures, however, this would be nice to have.""I would like the product to provide us with intelligence to understand what we really have in our environment.""It is generally good, but improving the performance would be the one thing I'd take a look at right now.""Despite being a blade, this is expensive.""The cost is a bit high but it is worth it.""Sometimes we had false positives where packages that were legitimate for us were blocked and we had to unblock them through exceptions."

More Check Point IPS Cons →

"Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day.""The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are.""Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted.""The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive.""The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution.""The installation was complicated.""The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive.""The solution needs to improve its local technical support services. There is no premium support offered in our market."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that the price of support is around $40,000 USD or $50,000 USD per year."
  • "The price of this product should be reduced."
  • "Enabling IPS does not require any additional license purchase from OEM, as it comes by default with the NGFW bundle."
  • "The pricing for Check Point IPS is competitive and brings good value for the money."
  • "The module has a considerable cost but you can save by purchasing a package with several modules instead of making a single purchase."
  • "Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
  • "There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
  • "You can pay for Check Point IPS yearly, or you can go with a three-year license. There's no extra cost apart from the standard licensing fee."
  • More Check Point IPS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."
  • "It's not too expensive."
  • "It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."
  • "If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
  • "The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
  • "The pricing could be lower."
  • "Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
  • "The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is called tunneling. Tunneling is one of the major security features that hackers cannot penetrate through.
    Top Answer:I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is very cheap and ten means it is very expensive. The product is expensive.
    Top Answer:The area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required consist of support availability. The tool's complete operating system architecture is being designed in such a way that it looks a… more »
    Top Answer:Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,477
    Comparisons
    3,840
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    4,047
    Comparisons
    2,972
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    424
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point IPS is an intrusion prevention system that aims to detect and prevent attempts to exploit weaknesses in vulnerable systems or applications. The solution provides complete, integrated, next-generation firewall intrusion prevention capabilities at multi-gigabit speeds with a low false positive rate and high security. It helps organizations secure their enterprise network, and protect servers and critical data against known and unknown automated malware, blended threats, and other threats.

    Check Point IPS Features

    Check Point IPS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Real-time protections: IPS is constantly updated with new defenses against emerging threats. Because the solution’s IPS protections are pre-emptive, it provides organizations with defenses before exploits are created or vulnerabilities are even discovered.
    • Virtual patching: The solution combines robust IPS functionality with a concerted patching strategy, allowing network administrators to secure networks between upgrades and patches.
    • Flexible deployment: Check Point IPS was designed to be deployed easily and efficiently.
    • 360 visibility and reporting: To help users achieve an unmatched level of visibility that detects and prevents threats, Check Point IPS integrates with SmartEvent, enabling security operations center (SOC) staff to respond to high-priority events first.

    Check Point IPS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Check Point IPS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Efficient: Check Point IPS includes acceleration technologies that let you safely enable IPS. Additionally, its low false positive rate can save a lot of time.
    • Secure: The solution delivers thousands of signature and behavioral preemptive protections, making it a very secure tool.
    • Unified: With Check Point IPS, users can Enable IPS on any Check Point security gateway, thereby reducing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

    Reviews from Real Users

    Check Point IPS is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has granularity capabilities for rule creation, quick updates of signatures, and a helpful mechanism that allows users to turn IPS signatures to a different mode automatically.

    A System and Network Administrator at Auriga mentions, “The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules. I can specify which definition to apply and to which scope or network.” The reviewer also adds, “I can create multiple profiles, which is helpful.”

    “The quick updates of the signatures when a new threat is identified are great. For instance, when Microsoft releases patches, we usually see new signatures for those issues that have to be patched in a day. This gives us time to test/deploy the patches while already being protected from the threats. Also, it's very good with reporting. I can generate reports for management automatically based on the threats of the last day/week/whatever is needed,” says a Systems en networks engineer at CB.

    Another PeerSpot user, a Network Engineer at VSP Vision Care, writes, “The mechanism where you can let the system automatically turn the IPS signature to a different mode (prevent / monitor / inactive) is a nice feature that allows us to easily adjust the balance between security protection and the risk of business impact.”

    Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

    Sample Customers
    Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point IPS is ranked 3rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 46 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is ranked 7th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews. Check Point IPS is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point IPS writes "Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention writes "A good amount of granularity and advanced URL filtering capabilities". Check Point IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS and Fortinet FortiGate IPS, whereas Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Arista NDR, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Darktrace. See our Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.