We performed a comparison between Check Point Quantum SASE and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."
"The solution is stable."
"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."
"On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."
"The characteristics that I have liked the most are the ease of implementation and administration."
"It has centralized management that allows administrators to supervise and control the security of the entire network."
"The solution offers both client and clientless versions for good remote access."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The DRP is the most valuable feature."
"The monitoring and granular policies are very helpful."
"The solution offers ATP features and management features."
"Review of exported and imported packages and protection and content filtering have been useful."
"The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability."
"The scalability of the solution is great."
"The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."
"Zscaler Private Access is a platform that eliminates the complexity of VPN configuration."
"We don't need to connect anymore. It is automatically connected when you log on in Windows."
"The product's most valuable features are cloud-based services and secure internet access. We don't have to set up any physical appliances."
"It is easy to use."
"It is straightforward to set up."
"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."
"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer"
"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."
"Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving."
"The suspend feature needs more control."
"While the product has been instrumental in enhancing security, continuous improvement is essential. Feedback from users and ongoing technological advancements should guide the refinement of these security measures."
"The integration from a management perspective could be improved so that the management can, from an existing Check Point firewall, manage a Harmony firewall through one pane of glass."
"There is an issue when installing the Check Point client."
"They should work towards the WAN intergration."
"The complex initial setup phase of the product is an area that can be improved"
"They could improve on the available public documentation."
"In order to be able to invite users, send the agent and implement it, the user input must be generated manually."
"It's an expensive solution."
"We would like to extend the SASE applications for Zscaler."
"More on-prem infrastructure is required when Zscaler Private Access is to be implemented as a single point of entry."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration."
"Zscaler Private Access's reporting is poor. We should have more insight into the reports regarding what is blocked and allowed."
"Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security."
"We'd like to have two-factor authentication that is quite simple."
"The menu for the ZIA portal could be organized a little bit differently. The most-used modules should be at the top of the menus, not somewhere near the bottom, some of them are not organized well in my opinion."
Check Point Quantum SASE is ranked 9th in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 31 reviews while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 3rd in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 34 reviews. Check Point Quantum SASE is rated 8.4, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Quantum SASE writes "Very agile with a granular level of control over users ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". Check Point Quantum SASE is most compared with Perimeter 81, Cisco Umbrella, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Netskope , whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cloudflare Access and Perimeter 81. See our Check Point Quantum SASE vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange report.
See our list of best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.
We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.