We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The forensics reports and the ability to sandbox malware are its most valuable features."
"One of its characteristics that we liked the most was its analysis and emulation of activities in the emails since it manages to review them and inspect them if they have an infected attachment."
"The most efficient and protective characteristics of Check Point's SandBlast solution are that we can see a lot of this protection at the network and mail levels."
"SandBlast updates the threat signatures frequently."
"You do not need to risk your network by using the in-line sandbox."
"Check Point SandBlast is best in terms of the extraction function. Customers can get a clean firewall with extraction after I've cleaned and scanned it from Check Point. It's easy for users, too."
"The product gives us advanced protection, including artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and services."
"In terms of the scalability, it's expandable across the cloud."
"The product is very easy to install."
"The most valuable features are the protection and that it is fast."
"The product's initial setup phase was not difficult."
"I like the sales operations testing. and support."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery is its complete end-to-end visibility of threats."
"As a security product, managing threats is crucial for my clients."
"The most valuable features are monitoring for advanced persistent threats, the system runs in a sandbox allowing for effective zero-day exploits management, and the Inspector has a built-in sandbox."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery is a very specific product for threat intelligence with smart protection."
"We would like to see this solution reach mobile devices more efficiently, through apps or more specific products."
"We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us."
"The initial setup was complex because of the lack of information from the consultant."
"They need to improve the GUI interface."
"There should be some improvement in the solution's stability and scalability."
"We have found a need for the application to be a bit more elastic, bringing it to SAS services and not IAS."
"The file types that can be scanned are limited, which means that if the file type is not listed or enabled for the sandbox, they are bypassed and it can lead to a security issue."
"EDR and EPM solutions like Carbon Black or CyberArk have integrations with the cloud version of Sandblast, however, there must be on-premise Sandblast options also."
"Trend Micro can improve the pricing in general. There is nothing else they can add or improve in the solution."
"I would like to see integration with third-party tools to improve the visibility of the dashboards."
"The solution could be more secure."
"I would like to see them create a rule where It could integrate with the network and start mitigating with auto-detection."
"The solution could be more stable and offer more security."
"Deep Discovery is easy to manage, but there is still room for improvement on the administration and operations side. Competing products have a cleaner interface that makes it easier to manage their products. Trend Micro offers a lot of features in one product suite, but it can be unwieldy for the customer to manage all that with a single interface."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery is a very expensive solution, making it very hard to sell."
"The product's security features need enhancement."
More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 33 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 17th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 23 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.4, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "High detection with few false positives and able to handle large volumes of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trend Micro Deep Discovery report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
