We performed a comparison between Cisco NGIPS and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Cisco NGIPS are protection and reporting."
"The technical support is impressive."
"We like the Cisco product, the concept, and the tech intelligence."
"It has good intelligence. It does a great job at stopping threats."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The URL filtering feature and the new locations feature are both valuable additions to the solution."
"The integration with the Cisco portfolio is very helpful."
"I like Firepower's automation, and the security intelligence is a powerful feature."
"For intrusion detection and mitigation, it has helped us in sort of known signatures and all sorts of things. So, we're very happy with the engine. That's the work."
"The technical support on offer is very good."
"The solution's IDS functionality filters the traffic and blocks malware by blocking the connections."
"The monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"You don't need any hardware because the solution is on the cloud. I like that Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is easy to install and manage."
"The most valuable feature is the central command center, where we can control and manage the solution."
"What I like about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is that it works okay. I don't have time to mess with the tool most of the time because I have way too many tasks to do, but Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System tells you when there's a problem, then it blocks the problem, so that's what I like most about it."
"A standout feature of TippingPoint is its strong integration with various solutions. It stands out as one of the leading network Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) in the current market and is known for its seamless integration with other solutions. For instance, when it identifies a potential threat within the traffic stream, it meticulously analyzes the data. Even in multilayer security scenarios, Tipping Point's network IPS can serve as a bypass for the basic firewall. If a threat is identified by Tipping Point, it promptly shares this information with the other systems. This ensures that they're updated and can employ the necessary solutions from their signature databases. The entire network gets safeguarded automatically. This integration extends to components like security and FX. This linkage streamlines our operations, offering a consolidated point of control for managing threats effectively."
More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Pros →
"More flexibility with the dashboards is needed because some of them are not fully developed."
"Some Next-Generation Firewall solutions come with Intrusion Prevention. It would be nice if Cisco NGIPS included that."
"Cisco can do better on their documentation because the product is really hard to understand."
"Overall, it lacks user-friendliness. It could be easier to manage. I can train any customer using FortiGate or Palo Alto in a few days, but with Cisco, it takes much more time because the systems aren't easy to use."
"The pricing is very expensive. They should make their equipment more affordable."
"The aspect of private party integration solutions could be improved."
"They could provide one solution to fit all the use cases."
"If there was a software-based solution for scaling up then it would be much better."
"It integrates well but it takes time."
"The firewall rules are limited."
"TTPS is a bit behind in visuals, the UI, and some data elements."
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."
"Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System needs strong Spanish-language support."
"The solution should provide the possibility to mix traffic and the traffic's geographical source to have improved functionality."
"I find Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System a bit clunky, and updating it can be a pain in the neck because you need to do it from time to time, so this is what needs to be improved in it. I would also rather have an all-in-one system that does intrusion detection, protection, web filtering, and also serves as a firewall, and my company is moving to an all-in-one solution, but I'm unsure of how soon that's going to be. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System also doesn't have enough bandwidth to handle the required traffic within my company, so it's going to be replaced."
More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Cons →
More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco NGIPS is ranked 5th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 63 reviews while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is ranked 8th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 19 reviews. Cisco NGIPS is rated 8.2, while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco NGIPS writes "Very effective for malware and signature-based anomalies but stability needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System writes "Operates in-line in the network, blocking malicious and unwanted traffic". Cisco NGIPS is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Discovery, Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System. See our Cisco NGIPS vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
