We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The solution is stable."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its security"
"The most valuable feature for us is management of the systems. We can easily access all features."
"Our organization has improved using this product because it helps enhance user experience. We use video communication a lot, like Skype. We used to get a lot of interference before and had a lot of issues during wireless voice or video calls. We get greater speed and performance with wireless now. It is nearly the same as a wired network."
"The integration is great."
"We've found the technical support to be helpful and responsive."
"The product’s stability is great."
"The solution is easy to use and its stable."
"Support is fantastic. They are helpful and responsive."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."
"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"There are performance issues, particularly with video calls where throughput is not great."
"The flexibility on the controllers isn't that great."
"The reporting tool in Cisco Wireless could improve. If I am trying to receive information about a client or user, it's cumbersome to retrieve the information on the controller system. If I'm trying to find out where a client's been, it's cumbersome. You need another tool for Historical logs, but it should be all in one."
"The price should be reduced. It should be cheaper."
"We use a Cisco product called Room Kit for meetings. It would be nice if Cisco could improve that. I would also like a cloud solution."
"Older versions are complex to configure and implement."
"We've recently had hardware issues which have caused us some problems."
"In this part of the world, support is the weak side of this solution."
"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"The setup was complex."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 147 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Omada Access Points, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.