We performed a comparison between Cleo Integration Cloud Platform and IBM B2B Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."
"The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."
"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."
"The solution is useful for transferring files from one format to another format. Also, the solution is useful in translation."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit."
"IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."
More Cleo Integration Cloud Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is rated 7.0, while IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cleo Integration Cloud Platform writes "Though the tool reduces the internal hosting cost for businesses, it needs to provide more API integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, SAP Process Orchestration and IBM Transformation Extender.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
