We performed a comparison between Cloudability and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management."Each user can have their own dashboard that they want to consume. Instead of having to share one dashboard for multiple users, you can create individual views for each user to view, and that view will contain only their own accounts, which allows for separation of data."
"The pricing isn't too expensive."
"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."
"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."
"Cloudability takes care of identifying and managing the cloud."
"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."
"The support from IBM is fantastic"
"Transparency and visibility are the key features."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"Cloudability needs to focus on more cloud providers."
"There are also some limitations with the dashboards and data representation in Cloudability."
"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."
"They can improve the custom range of the network."
"I would like the API functionality to improve. The update time after uploading data could also be improved."
"Cloudability needs to improve on data collection from cloud sources."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"We have dealt with a few technical support people where we ask for one thing and they might not deliver straightaway. It seems like they are a stretched across multiple customers."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
Cloudability is ranked 5th in Cloud Cost Management with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 16th in Cloud Cost Management with 1 review. Cloudability is rated 7.6, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cloudability writes "An excellent solution for dealing with multiple clouds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". Cloudability is most compared with Azure Cost Management, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Densify and CloudCheckr , whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and CircleCI.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.