We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Tableau based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Easy for beginners to use"
"It is very easy to create dashboards, charts, and graphs."
"The most valuable features are data discovery and fine visualizations."
"The use of a storyboard helps the flow of the data visualisation."
"All features are valuable. It is very user-friendly, and it is mostly drag-and-drop. If we have the dataset available, then we can develop any dashboard very quickly."
"It's the ease of use. It is also a self-service tool so it decreases the burden on having centralized IT-type teams or developers."
"The most valuable feature is the 3D charting."
"The most valuable part of the solution is the general dashboard features."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"It should have more integration with different tools and technologies. Its licensing cost should also be improved."
"Requires a lot of user training."
"They need to improve the icons and the filters, because they look too old, resembling Excel from 1997."
"We did have issues with Tableau 10.1 server with the brokers failing on heavy load but since moving to 10.2, then to 10.3, this issue seems to have been resolved and the environment is now quite stable."
"In the cloud sometimes the performance is a little bit slow."
"When we put more information on a single screen, it gets compressed and superimposed in many places while scrolling."
"When you create new fields in Tableau and you enter the formulas, there is a new small window that is there in the interface. You can enter the calculated fields, it could be more user-friendly. At this time it is limited and hard to understand at the beginning. The fields should be easier to use, such as in Microsoft Excel. You can have a difficult time understanding what to do in the fields, you end up doing trial and error to figure it out."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 43rd in Data Visualization while Tableau is ranked 1st in Data Visualization with 293 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Tableau is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tableau writes "Provides fast data access with in-memory extracts, makes it easy to create visualizations, and saves time". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS, iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas Tableau is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Domo, Amazon QuickSight, SAS Visual Analytics and Databricks.
See our list of best Data Visualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.