We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."
"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"The product has valuable security features."
"CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"The UX experience is very good."
"SAP HANA's interface is pretty user-friendly."
"The in-memory database is excellent."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is difficult for me to narrow down what the best features are in SAP HANA because they work together to provide the overall functionality of the solution. However, the Fiori application is very good."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"The most valuable features I have found are speed, dashboard, and reporting."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"It's a complex initial setup."
"It could be a bit more scalable."
"SAP HANA's long run time to extract data could be improved upon."
"The solution is very expensive for us."
"A documents preview could be helpful."
"The user interface and CRM need to be more user-friendly."
CockroachDB is ranked 10th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and Teradata, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our CockroachDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.