We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"With the Process Center, I can go to one place and view what all the environments are doing."
"The solution offers great notifications."
"It is transparent to business users because it is mostly picture based modelling."
"Some of the features that I like the most are team management and process performance. They are both very useful and very powerful with regard to the workflow."
"Setting it up is fairly easy. If somebody has knowledge of the system, he or she will be able to do it fairly quickly."
"It has reduced a lot of manual errors and processes."
"The process creation."
"It is a very powerful solution."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I'd like the tool to be more flexible."
"The interface is limited and should improve in the future."
"Process versioning was tricky, not straightforward."
"We need process monitoring. It is somewhat complex to monitor all the processes which work."
"If you want to use IBM BPM, you will have to invest a lot of money for licenses and you need to learn that there are limitations in developing applications. You cannot create anything you want."
"It is a really powerful tool, but its entry price is so high, which makes it a very exclusive club for who gets to use it. The thing that seemed to be the most intolerable was that you could put lots and lots of users on it, and it worked fine, but if you put lots and lots of developers on it, it sure seemed to have challenges. The biggest challenge was the development because of the Eclipse tool. It just seemed like irrespective of the development team that you put together, whether it had 10 or 50 people, you would end up having to reboot the development server throughout the day when you concurrently had lots of people hammering on the system. The development server just got sluggish. This was true for every project I was on. Once you got more than about five people working on the system at the same time, it would just get slower and slower during development work, and the only way to fix it was to reboot the server. It became just like a routine. Sometimes, we would reboot at lunch or dinner time, which is silly. After the cloud instances started rolling out, I never saw that again. That was probably the one big advantage of the cloud version. Instead of using an independent Eclipse-based process development tool, we moved to web-based process and design. The web-based tool definitely had greater performance than the Eclipse-based tool. I never got onto another project after that with 50 people, so I don't know how the performance is when you get a large team on it, but it definitely seems that the cloud design tool was a massive improvement."
"There are a few areas, like triggering mechanisms, externally exposed variables, and changing its values."
"I would like to see a lot more case studies."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.