We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
Comindware Tracker is ranked 36th in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 35th in Process Automation. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with . See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.