We performed a comparison between Coralogix and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies."
"We can use both on-premises and cloud setups."
"MuleSoft has given the API solution a 3-tiered architecture. This means that there are multiple channels available in one application. The usability is very high."
"Technical support has been helpful."
"The auto-creation of the API documentation is useful."
"Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the gateway that is provided."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower."
"An area for improvement in MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is the process of applying policies because it's manual. It would be great if MuleSoft could make the process easier, particularly by automating it."
"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager could improve the monitoring because it is very poor quality and not user-friendly. It is not as good as other solutions on the market."
"They should develop on MuleSoft as it would be a good way of improving API monetization."
"I think that they can bring some transparency in reference to the terms of the microservices architecture."
"The setup process could be simpler."
"Migrating any existing middleware platform to Mulesoft is difficult because of the transformation, conversion and integration involved. Better tools are needed to achieve quicker time to market."
"The most important thing that should be improved is that it is too heavy."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Coralogix is ranked 16th in API Management with 7 reviews while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 49 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry and New Relic, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise. See our Coralogix vs. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.