We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Splunk Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"We haven't had any limitations or problems connecting to our network devices."
"Splunk Cloud Platform's most valuable features are enterprise security and ticketing integration."
"Splunk helped reduce our mean time to resolve by around 60%."
"As compared to other tools, it is very easy. It is very easy to learn. It also integrates well."
"The ability to correlate data and then present it in a meaningful and valuable way is crucial."
"Not having to manage Splunk Cloud's infrastructure is valuable."
"This is a complete log reporting tool."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Cloud Platform is its flexibility and readiness because it's already prebuilt, and everything is click-to-go."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"Splunk should offer various options for real-time monitoring."
"There is sometimes no documentation or updated documentation available."
"They can streamline the process of creating custom apps."
"Some of the implementation is challenging. They're not very proxy-aware."
"The search for bulk data needs to be improved. When we were looking for the flow, we had to search really hard. I wanted to request the Splunk team to add some features for better search because getting the flow of the bulk data was sometimes hard."
"They can offer more self-service capability to their customers. Currently, most of the things happen behind the Splunk Cloud Platform. As a customer, I do not have an opportunity to see my platform. If they can offer more self-service to see the health of my endpoints and stack, it would be appreciated."
"Support could be improved."
"When one of my customers needs an app, and I am able to find that app on the Splunk base, I have to create a ticket and wait for five days for them to download the app into the cloud environment. That is probably one of the main things. It is painful because I have to wait to get that app in the cloud."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Splunk Cloud Platform is ranked 3rd in Data Visualization with 37 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Splunk Cloud Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Cloud Platform writes "Does not require backend maintenance, is easily integrated and utilized". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search, whereas Splunk Cloud Platform is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, AppInsights and Check Point Security Management. See our Coralogix vs. Splunk Cloud Platform report.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.