We performed a comparison between CoreOS Clair and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."
"The initial setup is seamless."
"The application visibility is amazing. For example, sometimes we don't know what a particular custom port is for and what is running on it. The visibility enables us to identify applications, what the protocol is, and what service is behind it. Within Azure, it is doing a great job of providing visibility. We know exactly what is passing through our network. If there is an issue of any sort we are able to quickly detect it and fix the problem."
"I like Palo Alto's threat protection and Wi-Fi coverage. It has advanced features like DNS security and sandboxing. The automation capabilities are excellent."
"The dynamic workload identity creation, attestation, and assignment is the best feature. In addition, the application dependency map across heterogeneous environments for compliance is a striking feature."
"It provides good visibility and control regardless of the complexity."
"The most valuable features of Prisma Cloud are its cloud security posture management and cloud workload protection capabilities."
"The policies that come prepackaged in the tool have been very valuable to us. They're accurate and they provide good guidance as to why the policy was created, as well as how to remediate anything that violates the policy."
"Prisma Cloud is quite simple to use. The web GUI is powerful. Prisma Cloud scans the overall architecture of the AWS network to identify open ports and other vulnerabilities, then highlights them."
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."
"The dashboard can be created at the user level instead of the cloud account level, which will help save time."
"It would be ideal if they could somehow reduce the deployment time."
"The automation capabilities are growing each day, but the problem is that the updates are not that frequent. There are some services on Amazon that have come out with updates, and Azure is also getting up to date. But Prisma takes some time to follow. There's a time gap that Prisma inherits from these clouds. I understand why it takes some time, but that time should be reduced."
"We have discovered that Prisma is not functioning properly with GCP."
"The information presented in the UI sometimes doesn't look intuitive enough."
"Prisma Cloud lags behind in terms of security automation capabilities."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"We had some teething issues with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but overall, it did what we expected."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
CoreOS Clair is ranked 26th in Container Security with 1 review while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews. CoreOS Clair is rated 8.0, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CoreOS Clair writes "Excellent detection accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". CoreOS Clair is most compared with Snyk, JFrog Xray, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Qualys VMDR, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.