We performed a comparison between Cornerstone Learning and iSpring Learn based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CYPHER LEARNING, Moodle, Google and others in Learning Management Systems (LMS)."Stability and scalability are good. They have four releases every year of which learning is a big portion of that. They're constantly refining and defining and they're embedding a lot of new technology into it all the time."
"The most valuable features of Cornerstone Learning are how they organized the management of the different content types is good. They are done in different ways which is a benefit. Additionally, the reporting 2.0 and playlist functionality are very good."
"Its user-friendly interface is most valuable. You can configure your welcome page and design it the way you want on your own."
"Cornerstone Learning's most valuable features are the keyword search, filters, and add-to-favorites option."
"The reporting feature is fantastic, and I also like the dynamic learning assignment feature. It is interactive and user-friendly. It is also highly stable, automated, and customizable."
"The most valuable feature of Cornerstone Learning is the reporting and learner transcripts."
"It's better than the previous learning solutions we had. We liked that it was global. We liked that you don't have to be logged into the company network to be able to use it. Those were really big benefits for us."
"Their integration features with other platforms are valuable. It is also relatively easy to use. Their library of training modules is fairly robust as well."
"We can quickly convert PowerPoint to e-Learning modules and add video and other resources to our e-Learning modules."
"Cornerstone Learning can improve reporting. If they had a harmonization of the administration UIs it would be great."
"There are some configuration elements that require Cornerstone engineering resources. It would be nice if we could self-serve. I would like the ability to manage the user interface or the navigation and layout of the pages that are displayed to end-users."
"Cornerstone Learning could improve the curriculum function by giving it more flexibility. I'm managing the solution and I adding content to the system, and overall, the backend of the system looks a bit dated. Cornerstone Learning has focused a lot on the user experience and less on the backend operational administrative experience. This could be improved overall."
"The recruitment module needs to be improved in Cornerstone Learning."
"In general, some of the portal pages have an outdated look and feel."
"There is a need for quite a bit of improvement. The reporting side of things definitely needs a lot of improvement. At the moment, it gives you a data dump. You have to open it up in Excel and filter out the bits that you don't want and need."
"Could use more robust reporting or more flexibility and scalability around the reporting side."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams for virtual sessions could be better"
"I would recommend some enhancements to the product."
Cornerstone Learning is ranked 6th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 28 reviews while iSpring Learn is ranked 11th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 1 review. Cornerstone Learning is rated 8.2, while iSpring Learn is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cornerstone Learning writes "Scalable LMS that keeps up with industry trends with continuous new releases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iSpring Learn writes "A solution with great customization and visually appealing features". Cornerstone Learning is most compared with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM Cloud, LinkedIn Learning and Pluralsight, whereas iSpring Learn is most compared with .
See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.