We performed a comparison between Cradlepoint NetCloud and Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature of this solution is the automatic failover."
"Cradlepoint NetCloud is very stable."
"It is easy to set up and requires a single administrator to maintain it."
"We have been satisfied with technical support."
"The solution is stable. It is great in terms of Oracle products, especially for Oracle databases."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control gives us diverse monitoring capability that can be extremely powerful."
"Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources."
"The solution provides very useful insights for application and database performance tuning. We were able to do away with guess work in determining where the bottlenecks were in application performance."
"Compared to other monitoring products, the user interface is very clear. It sends clear notifications."
"The solution is reliable."
"Of course, that you can manage and create the backup strategies from a central environment for all your environments, so you don’t have to do so on each database. You can set up the policy you want for each database, but you do it from a central environment."
"The performance of group-based clouds should be enhanced."
"It is missing important settings options."
"In our situation, the initial setup was complex."
"The on-premises installation is complex. It should be easier, especially for deploying agents that are running on a Windows machine that is running Oracle databases. It's very complex. Linux based machines aren't so complicated but it's complex for Windows."
"Oracle Data Guard monitoring: There are no alerts for redo log transport failure."
"They need to simplify it and make it lighter."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control needs to monitor other Oracle tools as well. It should also improve its pricing."
"The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database."
"The initial setup depends on your experience. For example, for people who are doing it for the first time, it's probably difficult."
"When registering a host, only if your host is running Linux will you get all the information which is available on EM. It would be nice if in future releases to include IBM AIX (primarily) and Microsoft Windows (secondly)."
"Adding new databases is difficult in Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control."
More Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cradlepoint NetCloud is ranked 17th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 3 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is ranked 15th in Cloud Management with 34 reviews. Cradlepoint NetCloud is rated 7.0, while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cradlepoint NetCloud writes "Simple to install and reliable, but technical support should improve their response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control writes "A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen". Cradlepoint NetCloud is most compared with Peplink SpeedFusion, Meraki SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco SD-WAN and Abiquo, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is most compared with AWS Control Tower, VMware Aria Operations, IBM Turbonomic and HPE OneSphere.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
