We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it alerts the security team so they can act fast. Plus, it automates stuff like resetting credentials or blocking users. So, if there's a potential hack, CyberArk can change passwords and lock out users in a snap. It also gives you a heads-up if anything unusual is going on with server activities, like someone creating new users with uncontrolled credentials."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"Trend Micro Apex One is good at detecting zero-day threats. When the solution was in operation I did not notice any system performance problems. Upgrades of the solution were simple to do and there are plenty of features."
"The initial setup is not that tough. It's easy."
"It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily."
"I have found Trend Micro Apex One to be secure."
"It's a stable solution, to date we have not had any issues."
"he setup is simple."
"The solution is powerful, simple to use, and very flexible. Having the solution in the cloud allows us to do remote work from anywhere."
"The solution can scale."
"The solution is very expensive."
"For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"Some of our customers need to add cache file signatures in Trend Micro Apex One, but it is currently not a supported feature."
"Some of the updates still require a complete reboot of the system."
"It could be more customizable."
"The solution should adjust its pricing for the smaller market we are in."
"The solution could improve the Linux XDR functionality. It is not mature. There could be some improvement in the area of the use cases. For example, improvement is needed in OTN."
"Technical support is very very slow. There is no French support. Only English. The experts are in England, the United States, or Japan, I don't know where. So the support is really lacking."
"The EDR feature is difficult to use and could be made more user-friendly."
"More integration with different platforms would be great, as everyone seems to want the solution to integrate with each team."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 125 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
