We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"There has been a noticeable increase in productivity for both my organization and clients."
"Intune's security features for Apple iOS and Mac OS are helpful. We can check enrollment, manage public and private settings, and manage the organization's data using security key features."
"Conditional access has helped us tailor and enforce our security policies in the mobile space."
"The ability to manage devices with different sets of policies is most valuable."
"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"There are so many features, but Windows Autopilot is one of the features that are very valuable for most customers."
"In terms of technical support, you will get an immediate response."
"The user interface could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"I'm not sure what needs improvement. It is a good platform."
"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."
"The product is not cheap, especially if you opt for an on-premise deployment requiring a complex server infrastructure. On the other hand, choosing the software as a service version simplifies infrastructure requirements but necessitates being online all the time."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"Intune could add more Linux security features and more integration with on-prem devices. The application deployments can also be improved."
"The product needs to upgrade itself when the server is overloaded."
"There should be more support for macOS. Even though macOS is supported by Intune and Microsoft is working very hard to get more features into Intune to manage macOS, that's one thing they can give a lot more attention to."
"I think there should be a better tracking of the cell phones used on the Intune."
"We need the capabilities of the Cloud Management Gateway (CMG) to be enhanced through Intune instead of Azure."
"For an existing customer who has an SCCM, it would need to be upgraded to an MECM first before I can introduce Microsoft Intune."
"In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 18 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 166 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". CyberArk Identity is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity Platform, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.