We compared Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Huawei Wireless is praised for its connectivity, performance, design, and battery life, with a focus on customer service and deployment times. D-Link Wireless highlights fast and reliable connectivity, range, and security features, with positive feedback on customer service and pricing. Huawei could improve signal strength and device compatibility, while D-Link could enhance connectivity and setup simplicity.
Features: Huawei Wireless stands out for its efficient performance, reliable signal strength, and user-friendly interface. It also offers a sleek design, extensive coverage range, long battery life, and advanced security features. In comparison, D-Link Wireless excels in fast and reliable connectivity, excellent range, strong signal strength, easy setup process, strong security features, and compatibility with various devices.
Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is praised for its reasonable and competitive pricing. Its setup cost is regarded as straightforward and hassle-free, ensuring a smooth installation process. Users appreciate the easily obtained and flexible licensing options. In contrast, D-Link Wireless is also considered reasonable and affordable in terms of pricing and setup cost, but user reviews do not explicitly mention its licensing aspect., Huawei Wireless has been shown to contribute positively to ROI, according to user feedback. Meanwhile, users express satisfaction with D-Link Wireless, highlighting its reliable performance and versatility.
Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless could improve its signal strength, compatibility with devices, user interface, durability, and longevity based on user feedback. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless could benefit from enhancements in connectivity, speed, range, signal stability, and simpler setup and configuration processes, according to user feedback.
Deployment and customer support: The feedback on Huawei Wireless suggests varying durations for deployment and setup, with some users spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. In contrast, D-Link Wireless had users mentioning a three-month deployment and a week for setup, but it is noted that sometimes these terms can refer to the same period., The customer service and support for Huawei Wireless are highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and expertise. Users have reported a professional and efficient experience. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless also receives praise for their responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful customer service, with users reporting positive experiences and satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 26 interviews we conducted recently with Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The solution is very secure."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"D-Link is a good product that is quite affordable and I recommend it."
"The solution is extremely easy to install. You just add them and in a few clicks, they are ready to go."
"I like the product's signal continuity and range. We can receive the signal up to 20-30 meters from the wireless antenna."
"The most valuable feature of D-Link Wireless is its durability."
"The tool supports new technologies."
"The connectivity is good."
"D-Link Wireless is a tool that is used since it is an easy and user-friendly product."
"The most valuable features of Huawei Wireless are WiFi coverage and ease of use."
"This solution is very simple and the interface is user-friendly."
"The solution's roaming feature is very nice. When you move to another place it automatically changes the access point. It's one of the most valuable features."
"What I like most about Huawei Wireless is that it's customizable. It has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, hiding features for different scenarios, low-density and high-density areas, and smart antennas."
"The solution is easily managed compared to other wireless solutions."
"The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations."
"The product is simple and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its simplicity."
"The solution is expensive."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"The price could be better."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"D-Link has some catching up to do in terms of advancing and improving its technology."
"It would definitely help if we had more advanced features for distributing bandwidth."
"Its interface and support system need much improvement. Sometimes, when we use the interface to reset the password and configure SSIDs, or some other changes, the "Save" option does not show and we have to go to some internal setting and then we can "save" the setting. The “Save” option should be in front of or below of the settings."
"The only issue is with the controller visibility of the devices connecting to the network."
"In future, it would also be good to have a switch within D Link that works as well as the Cisco 9200 Switch."
"The cloud managed solution needs improvement, and they should focus on the SD-WAN segment with regard to integration."
"The tool's technical support can get difficult sometimes. We got a technician only after complaining for 10-15 days. The tool's technicians need to be made available everywhere."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"The solution could be easier to use."
"I have already integrated the radius system with Cisco and Huawei products, but it can be further improved to be more user-friendly and easier to use."
"The demo program is an area for improvement in Huawei Wireless as it's hard to use. As a partner, you can use the solution for free, for thirty days, for example. On paper, everything looks fine, but you have to get permission and explain why you want to download the software, even if it's just for demo purposes. I don't get why I have to do this as a partner and still give an explanation that this would be for a demo setup. Downloading the solution isn't a click-and-install process that should go smoothly and efficiently. You have to get a lot of approvals and explain a lot, and in the end, you find out that you received the approval for one piece of software. It looks like you need additional software to use the software. My company asked for approval and received the approval three days later, but you need to install another software to use some of the features. In the past, most features were separate. Because Huawei wants a single pane of glass where all features should work with the Huawei equipment, Huawei decided to combine everything into the iMaster NCE Campus, which incorporates every other cloud solution. However, you still have to ask for approval for every piece of software, and without clear information on the features, the type of software, and the software files required, it's not so good from my point of view."
"Improving the visibility, control offered, and cloud management would all be very helpful. Also how you can monetize the information you get from Wi-Fi controllers should be improved."
"The stability could be improved."
"They should include more security features in the solution."
"As such, there are no problems. It has been good. There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product. We had to make some improvements in the network design. The product as such is fine, and there are no big issues. We are using the latest version having most of the features available in the industry, so the specs are very high. If something new comes up new in the industry, it needs to be incorporated into the product."
"The security of the solution could be better in the future."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
D-Link Wireless is ranked 11th in Wireless LAN with 15 reviews while Huawei Wireless is ranked 9th in Wireless LAN with 33 reviews. D-Link Wireless is rated 8.0, while Huawei Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of D-Link Wireless writes "Highly reliable, provides wireless access to resources, and supports new technologies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Wireless writes "Customizable and has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, and smart antennas". D-Link Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Omada Access Points, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Huawei Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Ruckus Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our D-Link Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
