We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The privileged access management module is the most reliable feature."
"It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the random changing of passwords."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it provides us with a secure way of managing passwords."
"The tool has many models. The tool also has a good cloud version. Also, the customers need not control any components on the solution side. The product's licensing model is also good since customers can choose a price that is most useful for them. The solution also supports password management for the users in your organization."
"The most valuable feature of Delinea Secret Server is secret password management."
"The user interface is quite good. It's very straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is session monitoring."
"We can use it remotely as well."
"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."
"Documentation could be improved if they were to include more about connectors. There is not enough documentation."
"Having more detailed reporting would improve this solution."
"The challenge for me with Delinea is that I may not be able to pitch it to an account with a low budget for PAM."
"The API is no good."
"The UI needs improvement because the interface is a little clumsy."
"One of the things that we want is to be able to do some of the management of it using APIs."
"Although the password policy was interesting, the default setting was inadequate."
"I formerly used only one service: the remote server. For example, I connected to the Active Directory user and the computer's console. But now, I need to do a remote connection to the domain controller. Maybe it only connects to that tool, the Active Directory users, and the computer management console, but not to the domain controller. Another thing Delinea could add is multi-factor authentication."
"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."
"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."
"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."
"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while ManageEngine PAM360 is ranked 15th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine PAM360 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine PAM360 writes " An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, whereas ManageEngine PAM360 is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, ARCON Privileged Access Management, WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM and Delinea Privileged Access Service. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
