We performed a comparison between Dell Avamar and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Effective in protecting the virtualization system and end points."
"The solution is very stable."
"We have a lot of backups, and this tool helps us with the RMAN Backup."
"The setup is very easy."
"The product has a proven track record of good backups without much of a failure ratio. It also has a good backup in terms of the compression ratio."
"The tool's most valuable features are backup management and speed."
"Scheduling is valuable. It does a good job of backing up, and it does a good job of restoring. Nobody has got a problem with that. The agents are well supported."
"The most valuable features are scalability and integration."
"I like the autofill-over feature and the simplicity of the solution."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"We use this solution as an integrated backup solution and it is integrated from the backup provider to the Nutanix solution."
"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."
"We find the ease of use valuable."
"Nutanix can converge legacy-style rack mount servers, so it is highly scalable."
"We have had a lot of problems with the Dell EMC Avamar solution. The snapshots are not being erased after backup."
"The solution should improve its tape-connectivity features."
"I would like to see better integration with third-party applications and platforms."
"It's very slow to backup and store information. It has two consoles and an application which are more difficult to use than a solution like Veeam."
"The user interface needs to be improved. It's not as good as it could be."
"The configuration and expansion aspects of the solution need improvement. They're complicated and don't really integrate well."
"The client caches and deduplication system have a few problems."
"I want to see a more user-friendly and administrator-friendly Dell Avamar. The solution also needs a better UI and dashboard."
"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."
"It could be cheaper."
"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."
"The solution's setup process should be simplified."
More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell Avamar is ranked 11th in Backup and Recovery with 81 reviews while Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is ranked 48th in Backup and Recovery with 6 reviews. Dell Avamar is rated 7.6, while Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Dell Avamar writes "Stable, integrates well with other solutions, and has a good price, but its UI needs a refresh". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup writes "An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support". Dell Avamar is most compared with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell NetWorker, Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA) and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is most compared with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Dell NetWorker, IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, Veeam Backup & Replication and Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA). See our Dell Avamar vs. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.