We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
"The solution is easy to learn."
"Our clients have requested by all types of testing, including mobile, desktop, and API testing and all of those are covered by Katalon. I find that very valuable, very complete."
"We can write code in Java and it is easy to link to other JARs that we find on the internet, which is very handy."
"The automation is very fast and you don't need to be overly proficient in coding."
"It provides us daily feedback on the status (failing/working) of the core features of our websites."
"The product provides ease of automation for the cloud."
"The tool has a good record and playback feature for functionality, which saves time when creating automated tests."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"It is difficult to identify elements on websites that use Angular or ReactJS because they don't have an option to view source code."
"It would be helpful if they can integrate a feature for performance testing."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"My recently-updated Katalon studio version hangs a lot and is not a stable version."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"Katalon Studio's pricing is expensive."
"During parallel execution, some reports are randomly switched."
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 28th in Test Automation Tools while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 42 reviews. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and Sauce Labs, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.