We performed a comparison between Docker and Legit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Supply Chain Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."
"Docker packages up an application as a single item that you can then run without the need to install or configure it to work on any specific machine."
"We are using Docker to host applications."
"Containerization is the most valuable feature. I can communicate to the Docker containers using other containers."
"The initial setup was easy, and you are only required to run commands."
"Docker is perfect for what I do...The solution is scalable."
"The lift and shift creates a lightweight image."
"Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale."
"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."
"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."
"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."
"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."
"The runtime and security could improve in Docker. Security is paramount in the cloud and important."
"The security layer is very vulnerable, although they are working to improve the system hardening and email hardening."
"It could be easier to create images and save them on reports. Just improved development workflow, just quicker, like some better user experience creating the images for the Docker containers."
"I would love to have it available on Linux."
"Docker could improve by providing the ability to use the GPU for parallel processing. If there was the capability of using the GPU it would improve the machine learning that I want to use."
"I have encountered network issues while connecting with microservices. I want to optimize the application layers over the bucket. It should also have better documentation."
"We are facing multiple issues with the solution's stability."
"Docker could improve by having more advanced features."
"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."
"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."
"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."
"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."
Docker is ranked 5th in Software Supply Chain Security with 40 reviews while Legit Security is ranked 7th in Software Supply Chain Security with 4 reviews. Docker is rated 8.6, while Legit Security is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Legit Security writes "Correlates information based on the integrations I have, which is extremely helpful". Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK), whereas Legit Security is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security and Cycode. See our Docker vs. Legit Security report.
See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.
We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
