We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Falcon LogScale based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."Helps in managing capacity planning, services performance, and tuning database performance and optimizing queries."
"UEM can be used for user impact analysis and troubleshooting."
"We can see which step in a transaction is causing latency, right down to the particular Java class"
"Our customers are now able to control their infrastructure with a single tool, and can easily check the connections with all components."
"We have identified and solved "mystery" issues that we have experienced for a long time, including sporadic latency issues on storage volumes and SQL databases not scaling properly when under certain loads."
"It helps us get to the resolution quicker, and potentially the root cause, and at least understand what is happening for future identification."
"Dynatrace has reduced our total headcount in operations and the mean time to detect and resolve problems. As a result, those challenging offline times are much shorter, if not non-existent, because of this solution."
"The main benefit is being able to pinpoint problems."
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"The business use case is that most people want to see how many orders came in. I'd like to be able to get data out of JavaScript tags, and capture more data. I think that would make it much more useful, rather than using Google Analytics. Instead, have one tool to capture all the stack, that would make it easy."
"There were a number of marketing promises that were made, which we do not see it in the tool yet. "
"I do not like the performance of the UI. It is really slow."
"There are some bugs in it. Sometimes things get hung just for second, and you have to refresh something. Also, they aren't necessarily intuitive, but to me, they're just going to get better over time."
"We are happy with the server monitoring, but we feel like the application monitoring should be improved."
"It needs certain UI changes to make going back to certain Windows easier. Certain windows open up in a different category with different set values and throw you off if you are not used to it."
"There is still a certain amount of technical skills needed to be able to understand what you are seeing on it. You also need a large amount of technical or infrastructure skills to understand how and where to install it."
"Experience with relationship/account manager has been really poor, it does not seem to be the firm's priority to support their customers."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 342 reviews while Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Splunk Enterprise Security, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM and Logpoint.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
